something catchy: \"AIIMS Board Jets to Bhopal for Twisha Sharma's Second Autopsy\". Not too clickbait.

5-7 paragraphs. Paragraph 1: Introduce situation, mention High Court order, that it's day of flight. Paragraph 2: Detail Court order, no doubt on first report, why second needed. Also mention date. Paragraph 3: Mention counsel for accused, concerns about doctors' reputation, perspective. Paragraph 4: Mention Solicitor General viewpoint. Paragraph 5: Explain authorization to AIIMS director, request to conduct as soon as possible. Paragraph 6: Broader context, why transparency matters, perhaps mention significance of marriage timing etc. Paragraph 7: End with lingering question. We should avoid banned words. Avoid \"pivotal, testify, comprehensive\". Avoid \"comprehensive\". Good. Check banned: \"pivotal\", \"delve\", \"underscore\", \"testament\", \"navigate\", \"comprehensive\", \"landscape\", \"transformative\", \"looking ahead\", \"crucial\", \"innovative\", \"foster\", \"leverage\", \"moreover\", \"furthermore\", \"it is important to note\", \"in a world where\", \"game-changing\", \"groundbreaking\". So avoid all those. Check language: \"AIIMS\" is fine. Use \"AIIMS Delhi\" head. Avoid \"pivotal\". We should ensure no repeated sentence structure: e.g., avoid starting sentences with \"The\". Provide variation. We need to ensure not to use AI-isms like \"delve\" or \"pivotal\". Should be fine. Also we might want to avoid \"comprehensive\". Let's not. Check each sentence. Paragraph 1: \"Four senior doctors from AIIMS Delhi will land in Bhopal tonight.\" That is 10 words? Fine, but 3-5 word short sentences too. We can separate. Maybe: \"Four senior doctors from AIIMS Delhi will land in Bhopal tonight.\" => 10 words, longer. Then a short: \"Flight details confirmed.\" (3 words). Next: \"The order came after a high court ruling.\" (8 words maybe). Might be similar structure to previous? We'll vary. Paragraph 2: talk about order. \"High Court in Jabalpur passed the order on May 22.\" (10 words). That's long. \"Navnidhi Sharma filed a petition.\" (5 words). That's short. \"Preservation of the body was directed.\" (5 words). Maybe repeat but okay. \"Second post-mortem required for clarity.\" (6 words). That's okay. Paragraph 3: counsel. \"Samarth Singh’s lawyer said no objection.\" (\"No objection\" short? Let's keep structure variation. \"Their concern centered on doctor’s reputation.\" (6 words). Paragraph 4: Solicitor General. \"Tushar Mehta urged court.\" (4 words). \"Second exam aims to boost confidence.\" (6 words). Paragraph 5: AIIMS director. \"The court tasked the director.\" (5). \"Formation of a medical board.\" (5). \"Urgency expressed for as soon as possible.\" (7). Paragraph 6: significance. \"Death occurred within six months of marriage.\" (7). \"Transparency becomes paramount in such cases.\" (6). \"Public trust hinges on thoroughness.\" (5). Paragraph 7: ending question. \"Will this set a precedent?\" (4). But we need no summary concluding. Ok. Need 400 words. We'll add more depth per paragraph. Ensure 5-7 paragraphs. We need to correct sentence structures: avoid same structure consecutively. Must alternate short/long. But we can't force each sentence; just avoid repetition. Let's craft in careful order. Paragraph 1: maybe two sentences: one long, one short. Paragraph 2: similarly. I think 7 paragraphs ~70-80 words each yields > 400 words. Let's draft. Paragraph 1: Sentence 1: \"Four senior doctors from AIIMS Delhi will land in Bhopal tonight.\" (10 words) Sentence 2: \"Flight time: 6:15 p.m.\" (4 words). Sentence 3: \"They carry the weight of a court’s order.\" (7 words) Paragraph 2: Sentence 1: \"On May 22, the Jabalpur High Court directed a second autopsy.\" (12 words) Sentence 2: \"Navnidhi Sharma, the widow's father, filed the request.\" (9 words) Sentence 3: \"Preserving the body remains a key clause.\" (7 words) Sentence 4: \"The court insisted the fresh test should not cast doubt on the initial report.\" (12 words) Paragraph 3: Sentence 1: \"Counsel for Samarth Singh admitted no objection.\" (7 words) Sentence 2: \"The spokesperson warned against tarnishing local doctors' reputations.\" (10 words) Sentence 3: \"They argued that one more examination is unnecessary.\" (9 words) Paragraph 4: Sentence 1: \"Solicitor General Tushar Mehta stepped into the stand.\" (10 words) Sentence 2: \"His stance was clear: build public trust.\" (7 words) Sentence 3: \"He framed the second post‑mortem as a reassurance, not a reb","tool_calls":[]}